Example of a hierarchy of validation tiers for pyroclastic currents. (A) Complete system (public domain photo courtesy of B. Voight, Penn State University). (B) Subsystem (public domain photo courtesy of Jonathan Stone). (C) Benchmark case (photo courtesy of G. Lube, Massey University, NZ). (D) Unit problem (picture modified after Hallworth…
Archiviati
Estimating eruptive parameters and related uncertainties for pyroclastic density currents deposits: worked examples from Somma-Vesuvius (Italy)
Example of the identification of two segments (segment 1 in light orange and segment 2 in dark orange) for the MRL50 of the EU4b unit. Starting from these two segments (and from the others that compose the whole outline), different uncertainty bounds are traced according to the amount and quality…
Multiphase flow behaviour and hazard prediction of pyroclastic density currents
Conceptual models and multiscale spectra of PDCs Lube G., E.C. P. Breard, T. Esposti-Ongaro, J. Dufek and B. Brand (2020).Nature Reviews – Earth & Environment, 1, 348–365, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0064-8. Abstract Pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) are dangerous multiphase flows originating from volcanic eruptions. PDCs cause more than a…
Via al bando per il conferimento di 11 borse di alta formazione e ricerca-azione ai giovani
L’Istituto Nazionale di Ottica (INO) del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, capofila del progetto ORMA “Alta fORMAzione e ricerca-azione presso enti di ricerca toscani”, ha indetto una selezione per il conferimento di 11 borse di studio di Alta Formazione da fruirsi presso: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Area di Firenze e Area…
Ground Motion Models for the new seismic hazard model of Italy (MPS19): selection for active shallow crustal regions and subduction zones
Trellis plot of the median values of the GMMs pre-selected for ASCRs Lanzano G., L. Luzi, V. D’Amico, F. Pacor, C. Meletti, W. Marzocchi, R. Rotondi, E. Varini (2020).Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, doi: 10.1007/s10518-020-00850-y. Abstract The aim of this paper is to identify the ground motion models (GMMs),…
Comparative analysis of the structures and outcomes of geophysical flow models and modeling assumptions using uncertainty quantification
Figure 2. Volcán de Colima—comparison between max flow height maps of simulated flow, assuming MC (a,d), PF (b,e), and VS (c,f) models. Extreme cases—(a–c) max. volume–min. resistance and (d–f) min. volume–max. resistance. Patra A.K., A. Bevilacqua, A. Akhavan-Safaei, E.B. Pitman, M.I. Bursik, and D. Hyman (2020).Frontiers in Earth Science, doi:…
Devi effettuare l'accesso per postare un commento.